Organizations feel the pressure to simplify their contract processes, but the question is—how?
If you’re reading this, you’ve probably hit a wall with the popular tool for this purpose: GetAccept. Maybe the CRM integration isn’t syncing the way you need it to. Maybe you’re paying for features your team never touches. Or maybe you just know there’s got to be a better way to handle the chaos between “yes, let’s do this” and “here’s your signed contract.”
Well, you’re in the right place. This guide walks through 10 GetAccept alternatives that solve real problems for companies managing complex sales cycles that just want contracts signed without jumping through hoops. We’ll cover Oneflow, PandaDoc, DocuSign, DealHub, Proposify, Qwilr, Better Proposals, Juro, DocSend, and Ironclad.
Why businesses look for GetAccept alternatives for contract management
GetAccept has built a solid reputation as a proposal platform in the digital sales room space. The platform combines proposal creation, contract management, and legally binding electronic signatures with buyer engagement tracking. Sales teams use it to create deal rooms where prospects can review sales materials, negotiate terms, and sign contracts.
But here’s where the cracks start showing:
- Limited customization and rigid templates: Users frequently mention that GetAccept’s templates lack flexibility. When you need to adapt a contract for a specific client or an unusual deal structure, you find yourself limited by rigid templates and a lack of flexibility.
- Weak CRM integration: While GetAccept claims to integrate with major CRMs, the reality falls short of the promise. Data doesn’t sync bidirectionally, leaving sales reps manually updating records. For teams that need deep Salesforce integration or a seamless integration with other CRMs, this creates daily friction and increases manual work.
- Fragmented workflows between the sales room and the deal room: GetAccept splits its functionality across separate sales and deal room environments. This division creates unnecessary friction when you’re trying to move a prospect through your pipeline and streamline workflows across teams.
- Paying for bundled features you don’t need: GetAccept’s pricing structure pushes users toward comprehensive packages. Even if you just need contract management software with solid e-signatures, you end up paying for digital sales room features your team never touches.
- Quote-to-cash gaps: GetAccept handles signatures well enough, but it lacks post-signature workflows for invoicing, revenue recognition, and financial handoffs, forcing teams to add on extra software and juggle an increasingly crowded tech stack.
Best GetAccept competitors: Comparison table
Before we dive in, here’s a brief overview of how the top 10 GetAccept alternatives compare to GetAccept
| Tool | Paid plans start from (monthly) | Best for | Capterra rating | Key features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GetAccept | $25/user | Sales teams needing proposal tracking, buyer engagement insights, and contract signing in one platform | 4.6/5 | Interactive sales documents, buyer analytics, proposal & contract tracking, e-signatures, mutual action plans |
| Oneflow | $20/user | Mid to large businesses needing full contract lifecycle management with deep CRM integration | 4.6/5 | Dynamic contracts, AI-powered review, edit-after-send, approval chains, digital signatures, quote-to-cash workflows |
| PandaDoc | $35/user | Sales teams wanting document automation with CPQ | 4.5/5 | Drag-and-drop editor, templates, deal rooms, payment collection |
| Docusign CLM | $65/user | Enterprises needing end-to-end contract lifecycle management + e-signature | 4.5/5 | CLM workflows (authoring, approvals, negotiation, repository) with compliance and audit trails |
| DealHub | Custom pricing | SaaS companies with complex CPQ needs | 4.7/5 | Advanced CPQ, guided selling, revenue workflows |
| Proposify | $29/user | Marketing agencies creating visual proposals | 4.4/5 | Design-focused templates, interactive content, CRM sync |
| Qwilr | $39/user | Sales teams wanting web-based interactive proposals | 4.6/5 | Web page proposals, dynamic pricing tables, payments |
| Better Proposals | $19/user | Freelancers and small agencies | 4.8/5 | Templates, live chat integration, proposal analytics |
| Juro | Custom pricing | Fast-growing companies needing browser-native contract workspace | 4.8/5 | Browser-based editor, AI assistance, self-serve workflows |
| DocSend | $15/user | Teams needing secure document sharing and analytics | 4.5/5 | Document tracking, virtual data rooms, one-click NDAs |
| Ironclad | Custom pricing | Enterprise legal teams managing complex agreements | 4.4/5 | Workflow automation, AI analytics, extensive customization |
Top 10 GetAccept alternative options
Oneflow
Oneflow is a contract management platform that goes far beyond simple e-signatures. Where GetAccept treats contracts as static documents, Oneflow turns them into dynamic, living agreements that connect your entire quote-to-cash process. The user-friendly interface makes it easy for sales teams to generate and manage contracts in just a few clicks. The platform also offers an AI writing assistant and allows teams to collaborate seamlessly while automatically tracking the changes.
With Oneflow, sales reps can generate proposals directly from the CRM, adjust pricing during negotiations without resending documents, and route accurate data to finance for invoicing. With bidirectional CRM sync, customer and deal information stays consistent across Salesforce or HubSpot and every contract step—supporting cleaner recordkeeping alongside the platform’s detailed audit trails for each contract action, meeting compliance controls requirements.
Why Oneflow beats GetAccept
GetAccept splits functionality between deal rooms and contract rooms, creating friction in your workflow. Oneflow keeps everything in one place with a more seamless, end-to-end approach—so even after an agreement is sent, you can update and adjust terms using dynamic contracts without restarting the process.
The real difference shows up when you look at the entire quote-to-cash process. GetAccept stops at the signature, while Oneflow ensures contract data flows directly into your connected systems, preventing revenue leakage caused by incomplete or incorrect information in finance.
Teams can create custom approval workflows that match their specific business requirements, route documents through multiple stakeholders, and track engagement at every stage. The platform’s analytics give you insights into contract performance, bottlenecks, and signing patterns.
Key features
- Dynamic HTML contracts that remain editable post-send
- Native e-signatures with full legal compliance
- AI-powered contract analysis for risk detection
- Deep bi-directional CRM integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics)
- Real-time collaboration capabilities with inline comments
- Advanced approval workflows with detailed audit trails
- Contract repository with full-text and metadata search across document content
- Comprehensive analytics and contract insights
- API access for custom integrations
- Document routing capabilities
- Advanced customization options
Try Oneflow to see how dynamic contracts can transform your contract process, no strings attached.
User review
PandaDoc
PandaDoc is an all-in-one contract automation platform and document management solution with features for document creation, legally binding electronic signatures, and workflow automation. The platform’s drag-and-drop editor and template library make creating proposals straightforward. It’s a middle ground between basic e-signature tools and complex contract lifecycle management systems.
Why it’s better than GetAccept
PandaDoc has unlimited document creation and truly unlimited e-signatures, which GetAccept restricts on lower tiers. The content library lets you build reusable content blocks, making it faster to assemble customized sales materials. Connectors with tools like HubSpot and Salesforce provide a more seamless integration. While GetAccept splits digital sales rooms and contracts into separate products, PandaDoc keeps everything unified.
Key features
- Extensive template library
- Drag-and-drop document editor
- Custom approval workflows and document routing
- Electronic signatures with certificates of completion
- Payment collection within documents
- Document analytics and tracking to track engagement
- CPQ for dynamic pricing with pricing tables
- Interactive deal rooms
- CRM integrations
- Mobile-responsive documents
- Detailed audit trails
- Advanced analytics
User review
For more on how PandaDoc compares to other options, check out our guide on PandaDoc alternatives.
Docusign CLM
Docusign is best known for its digital signatures product, but it also offers a CLM solution, which supports end-to-end contract lifecycle management—from contract generation and approval workflows to negotiation, execution, and storage. If your organization needs a scalable, compliance-driven platform that works well across Legal, Sales, Procurement, and Finance, Docusign is a strong fit. It’s especially suited to teams that want formal controls, auditability, and enterprise integrations alongside legally binding signatures.
Why it’s better than GetAccept
Docusign has a broader enterprise functionality and deeper integrations than GetAccept, especially for regulated industries and large organizations. It also supports structured workflows and centralized contract management, giving teams more control over approvals, versioning, and long-term contract governance.
However, Docusign CLM can feel more heavyweight and process-driven than lighter proposal-first tools like GetAccept. Some teams may also find that it requires more implementation time to configure workflows, clause logic and integrations.
Key features
- Enterprise-grade, legally binding electronic signatures
- Full CLM workflows
- Clause library and template-based contract generation
- Approval routing, role-based permissions and version control
- Detailed audit trails and tamper-evident seals
- Authentication and identity verification
- Contract repository with search, reporting and governance controls
- Strong compliance support (e.g., ESIGN, eIDAS) and enterprise security frameworks
- Integrations with enterprise systems
- Workflow automation and document routing across teams
User review
Learn more in our comparisons: Docusign alternatives or PandaDoc vs Docusign.
DealHub
DealHub is where CPQ meets contract lifecycle management. The platform is built for sales teams dealing with complex product configurations, multi-tier pricing, and approval requirements in complex sales cycles.
DealHub’s guided selling features help sales reps configure product combinations without constantly checking with product or finance. The platform includes mutual action plans for buyers and sellers to keep deals moving forward with clear next steps, milestones and dependencies.
Why it’s better than GetAccept
DealHub has CPQ capabilities that handle complex product bundles, tiered pricing, volume discounts, and subscription models. Approval workflows can route documents based on deal size, discount levels, or custom business rules, letting you create custom approval workflows that match your specific requirements.
The quote-to-revenue value extends beyond what GetAccept brings, connecting deal data directly to fulfillment and billing systems.
Key features
- Advanced CPQ with guided selling
- Dynamic pricing and discount management
- Automated approval workflows based on business rules
- Interactive proposals with product catalogs and pricing tables
- Subscription and usage-based billing support
- Revenue workflow automation
- Deep CRM integration
- Contract management and legally binding signatures
- Sales playbooks and content management for sales materials
- Deal collaboration rooms
- Document routing capabilities
- Advanced analytics for engagement tracking
- Detailed audit trails
User review
Proposify
Proposify takes a design-first approach to proposal software. If you want proposals that look nothing like the templated PDFs everyone else sends, Proposify gives you the creative freedom to stand out.
The platform helps marketing agencies, consulting firms, and creative services businesses create visually impressive proposals that reflect their brand standards. The focus on aesthetics doesn’t sacrifice functionality; you still get e-signatures, CRM integration, and detailed analytics.
Why it’s better than GetAccept
Proposify’s design capabilities exceed those of GetAccept. The proposal builder gives you granular control over layout, typography, and visual elements with advanced customization. For agencies where the proposal itself serves as a portfolio piece, this matters.
The content library keeps approved sections organized and accessible, making it faster to assemble custom proposals without compromising on-brand consistency. Proposify’s advanced analytics show exactly how prospects engage with each proposal section, helping you refine your approach.
Key features
- Design-focused proposal builder
- Customizable templates with brand controls
- Content library for reusable sections
- Interactive pricing tables
- Native e-signatures delivering legally binding signatures
- CRM integrations
- Engagement analytics
- Comment and collaboration features
- Mobile-responsive proposals
- Payment integration
- Document routing
- Detailed audit trails
User review
Compare Proposify to other options in our Proposify alternatives guide or see PandaDoc vs Proposify.
Qwilr
Qwilr reimagines proposals as interactive web pages. You get mobile-responsive proposals that feel more like modern websites than traditional documents. This approach gives prospects a more engaging experience. They can interact with pricing options, watch embedded videos, and sign directly on the proposal page without downloads or separate productivity tools.
Why it’s better than GetAccept
Qwilr’s web-based proposals load faster and look better on mobile devices than GetAccept’s document-based approach. The interactive pricing tables let prospects see real-time calculations as they adjust options.
The platform’s advanced analytics go deeper than GetAccept’s tracking, showing exactly which content sections prospects spend time on. This insight helps sales reps tailor follow-ups based on demonstrated interest rather than guessing. Teams can gain insights into buyer behavior and track engagement throughout the sales process.
Key features
- Web page-based interactive proposals
- Dynamic pricing tables with real-time calculations
- Embedded payments
- CRM automation with seamless integration
- Legally binding electronic signatures
- Rich media embedding (videos, spreadsheets, maps)
- Page view analytics
- Custom domain hosting
- Mobile-optimized experience
- Template library for sales materials
User review
Better Proposals
Better Proposals keeps things simple. The proposal platform helps freelancers and small businesses create professional proposals without a steep learning curve. With multiple available templates covering various industries and use cases, there’s no need to design from scratch.
Why it’s better than GetAccept
Better Proposals costs less and requires less setup than GetAccept. For small teams that don’t need digital sales rooms or complex deal tracking, it covers the essentials.
A unique feature is the live chat integration that lets prospects chat directly within proposals.
Key features
- Customizable templates and content library
- Drag-and-drop editor with a user-friendly interface
- Legally binding electronic signatures
- Live chat within proposals
- Payment collection
- Proposal analytics and notifications
- CRM integrations
- Custom branding
- Mobile-responsive design
- Document routing
- Audit trails
User review
Juro
Juro is a browser-native workspace that keeps everything (drafting, negotiation, approval, signing, and storage) in one collaborative environment with a user-friendly interface. Everything happens with real-time collaboration, making it faster for legal and business teams to work together and streamline workflows. Teams can also route documents and create custom approval workflows.
Why it’s better than GetAccept
Juro’s browser-based approach eliminates the file management headaches. Multiple stakeholders can review and redline simultaneously without the version-control nightmares that plague complex workflows.
Business teams can generate contracts from approved templates without waiting for legal review each time. This speeds up routine agreements while keeping legal in control of templates and workflows.
Key features
- Browser-native contract editor
- AI-powered contract analysis and review
- Real-time collaboration with inline comments
- Self-serve contract generation from templates
- Custom approval workflows
- Native e-signatures
- Contract repository with AI search
- CRM integrations
- Custom fields and conditional logic
- Detailed audit trails and version control
- Document routing capabilities
- Advanced analytics
- Engagement tracking features
User review
Check out Juro alternatives for more comparisons.
DocSend
DocSend (now part of Dropbox) focuses on securely sharing and tracking any file you already have, not so much on creating documents. The platform works well for investment pitches, board materials, and confidential proposals that require tight control over who sees what. Virtual data rooms support due diligence processes without exposing sensitive files. Teams can track engagement and gain insights into how recipients interact with sales materials.
Why it’s better than GetAccept
DocSend’s document security features exceed GetAccept. You can set expiration dates, require email verification, disable downloads, and even revoke access after sharing. Real-time advanced analytics show exactly who viewed what and for how long, helping you track engagement effectively. The one-click NDA feature removes friction from the typical process. However, DocSend doesn’t handle document creation.
Key features
- Secure document sharing with access controls
- Real-time document analytics to track engagement
- Virtual data rooms
- One-click NDA execution
- Download and screenshot protection
- Custom branding on shared links
- Email verification and authentication
- Expiration dates and access revocation
- File request functionality
- Integration with cloud storage and productivity tools
- Advanced analytics
- Detailed audit trails
- Document routing
User review
Ironclad
Ironclad targets enterprise legal teams managing high-volume, complex contracting. The platform handles the full contract lifecycle management with workflow automation, AI-powered analysis, and customization options to create custom approval workflows. Cross-functional teams can route documents through intricate approval chains and gain insights from detailed analytics.
Why it’s better than GetAccept
Ironclad’s workflow automation goes far beyond GetAccept’s capabilities. You can model any approval process with conditional routing based on contract values, risk factors, or custom business logic.
The AI contract analysis identifies non-standard clauses, flags risky terms, and extracts metadata automatically. The platform’s reporting and advanced analytics provide visibility into contract performance. Detailed audit trails capture every action for compliance controls.
However, this comes with complexity and cost. Implementation can take months, and costs start higher than other options, with bespoke pricing.
Key features
- Complex workflows handling
- AI-powered contract analysis and risk identification
- Native Word integration with browser editing
- Advanced approval workflows
- Contract repository with AI search
- Obligation tracking and alerts
- Extensive reporting and analytics
- Integration with enterprise systems
- Vendor management for sales materials and contracts
- Detailed audit trails
User review
Move beyond the GetAccept digital sales room limitations
If you’re looking for the right GetAccept alternative that bridges proposals, contracts, signatures and revenue operations with seamless integration, Oneflow delivers.
The platform’s dynamic contracts, deep CRM integrations, and AI-powered features give mid-market and enterprise teams the capabilities they need without forcing them into rigid enterprise software patterns. Real-time data sync keeps your systems aligned, while edit-after-send capabilities keep negotiations moving without bureaucratic friction. Teams can create custom approval workflows, route documents efficiently, and track engagement without the need for separate tools.
Ready to see how modern contract management tools should work? Try Oneflow and experience contracts that actually help close deals instead of slowing them down.
FAQs
What GetAccept alternative has the best CRM integration with HubSpot?
Oneflow offers the strongest HubSpot integration among GetAccept alternatives. The platform syncs bidirectionally with HubSpot, automatically creating contracts from deal data and updating HubSpot records as contracts progress. You can generate proposals directly within HubSpot without switching tools, and all contract data flows back into your CRM.
Why do companies switch from GetAccept to other solutions?
Companies typically switch from GetAccept for three main reasons: inadequate CRM integration that forces manual data entry and disrupts document processes, limited post-signature workflows that create gaps in the quote-to-cash process, and pricing that bundles features teams don’t need.
The fragmentation between GetAccept’s sales room and contract room also drives teams toward unified document management platforms that handle the entire contract lifecycle in one place with a user-friendly interface.
What are the best GetAccept alternatives for different needs?
If you need an alternative to GetAccept, Oneflow is a strong option for comprehensive contract lifecycle management with AI features and deep integrations that support a smoother end-to-end quote-to-cash process. If you’re focused on document automation and CPQ, PandaDoc is a solid choice. If you need enterprise-grade, legally binding e-signatures, DocuSign is a reliable standard. If browser-native contract collaboration is your priority, Juro is a great fit. For teams that primarily want proposal software, options like Proposify, Qwilr, Better Proposals, or Adobe Acrobat Sign can also be good.
Is GetAccept good for quote-to-cash processes?
GetAccept supports proposal creation and contract signing with legally binding signatures. However, it lacks post-sign functionalities for revenue recognition, billing automation, and seamless financial system integration. For companies looking to optimise the quote-to-cash process, platforms like Oneflow that connect contract data directly to billing and revenue systems provide more complete solutions.
